Jos jedan pokazatelj sta ce biti sa Srbijom, izdajnicka vlast je tendeciono i planski unistila svu industriju i obezvredila prodajnu vrednost svih Srbskih firmi da bi ih na talonu predala zapadnik monstrumima da nas obsednu i orobe za narednih 2000 godina, a uz minimalnu odstetu i investiciju! Novac koji su dali za potplacivalje nasih izdajnika u vladi da bi im ovo bilo omoguceno, kosta zapad vise nego sama "kupovina" sve Srbskog! Radnici Jat-a insistirajte da se Jat prikljuci Aeroflot-u, Rusi nude 300 miliona EURA a posle "neuspesnog" tendera, koji je trebao da "pokaze", citaj ubedi naciju da Jat nista ne vredi, Dinkic i ostali ce da nastoje da ga prodaju za nista EU ili Hazarskim amerima! Jat-ovci su "angazovali" "ekspert" firmu Rothchild (Hazari) da im pomogne da prodaju Jat za "lepe" pare a umesto toga sad ovo! Osvestimo se Srbi!

Braco Srbi, ETO, NAJZAD! Evo sta su Dinkic, Djelic, Tadic i ostala djubrad uradili!!! Rusi su odlucili da naftovod ide preko Ruminije. BRAVO DINKICU, TADICU, DJELICU,..
BRAVO HOSTAPLERSKI NARODE SRBIJE!! ZASLUZIO SI NUKLEARNU BOMBU!! Oaj ko zna engleski moze da procita.

South Stream may be rerouted through Romania

Italy's energy giant Eni, tired with Serbia's delay in ratifying the agreement with Russia on the acquisition of oil refinery Naftna Industrija Srbije (NIS) and construction of the South Stream gas pipeline across its territory, has proposed building it in Romania.

Analysts say Serbia may lose as much as 130 million euros in additional profits from gas transit tariffs if this happens.

Gazprom has declined to comment on a possible change in the pipeline's route, but a source in the Russian gas monopoly said it was technically possible.

Eni has also made no comment.

Initially, Romania, Hungary and Slovenia were regarded as possible transit routes for the South Stream pipeline linking Russia to the European Union across the Black Sea. Later, it was decided to reroute the pipeline through Serbia.

Last January, Russia and Serbia signed a package agreement on the construction of the pipeline across Serbia, the completion of the underground gas storage facility Banatski Dvor and the sale of NIS to Gazprom Neft, the oil arm of Gazprom.

The previous Serbian government ratified the document in May and sent it for approval to parliament, which had no time to consider it. In July, the new Serbian government once more approved it and forwarded it to parliament, which is due to discuss it on September 2.

However, the process could grind to a halt, because Serbia has said it was unhappy with the proposed price for NIS. Gazprom Neft is to pay 500 million euros for a 51% stake in the company and to invest as much in its modernization.

Deputy Prime Minister Mladjan Dinkic has said the construction of the South Stream pipeline across Serbia could come under question unless Russia agrees to pay more for NIS.

Dmitry Lyutyagin, an oil and gas analyst at the Moscow-based investment company Veles Capital, said Gazprom as the key player in the project will insist that the pipeline be built across Serbia because Gazprom Neft needs to buy the Serbian refinery to implement its strategy.

Vitaly Kryukov, an analyst with the Capital Investment Group, said the construction of the pipeline across Romania would not seriously increase its cost, assessed at over $20 billion. In view of Serbia's foot-dragging policy, it is logical that Eni would be prepared to reroute it, he said, adding that its obstinacy could cost Serbia 130 million euros in additional transit profits.

Vedomosti